THE ROLE OF THE COURT OF CASSATION CRIMINAL COURT IN THE SUPREME COURT IN THE TRAINING OF LAWYERS-LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS IN THE UNITED STATES OF THE MINISTRY OF INTERPRETATION

Abstract

Court practice occupies a prominent place in the
understanding/interpretation of criminal law norms. Although officially judicial
precedent is not a source of law in Ukraine, in reality, relying on the Unified State
System of Criminal Procedure, that is, the decisions of previous courts, there is always an opportunity to weigh all the pros and cons for the purpose of uniform
and correct understanding and application; fair, expedient and necessary
imposition of punishment and making an individual-authoritative decision on the
case - a verdict, which will be the final verdict in courts of general jurisdiction
until it is appealed to higher appellate and cassation instances, as well as the
ECHR, the ICC, etc.
The question arises as to why our citizens are increasingly turning to
international commercial arbitration in search of protection of their rights.
Because they do not trust the national Ukrainian courts, where corruption
operates and everything is interconnected. On the other hand, such corruption is
also present in other countries, when there is an opportunity to influence the
court in Italy, Britain or many other countries. Everything in this world is
relatively and closely interconnected/intertwined with each other. Another
dilemma is the practice of recognizing decisions of foreign courts on the basis of
the international principle of "reciprocity and civility", which does not always
work in domestic realities.