METHODS OF INTERFERENCE IN THE ACTIVITIES OF STATE AUTHORITY BODIES

Abstract

The article determines that the methods of interference in the activities of
representatives of state authorities, as a rule, are not fully structured, they are
characterized by only two stages: preparation and direct commission. Based on
the generalization of the provisions of scientific works and materials of
investigative and judicial practice, it is determined that the typical methods of
interference in the activities of representatives of state authorities include all
those that are associated with interference in their activities by physically
obstructing the performance of functional duties. These include: failure to provide
physical access to the scene of the incident in order to further perform official
duties within the limits provided for by law; expression of ultimatums regarding
the failure of an employee of a state authority to perform his functional duties,
including with the use of threats or with the threat of not providing the
opportunity to receive certain benefits; preventing the seizure of material objects
that are private property, but which have been seized on the basis of a court
decision and which are subject to further implementation in order to ensure the
resolution of the claims that became the basis for the opening of enforcement
proceedings, etc. According to the results of the analysis of investigative and
judicial practice, it was determined that in the absolute majority of cases, the
persons involved do not commit actions to conceal illegal activities.